OpenAI has hired Sachin Katti, formerly Intel’s Chief Technology and Artificial Intelligence Officer, recently to lead development of its computing infrastructure for AGI at OpenAI’s engineering teams in San Francisco so the firm can scale high‑performance systems, reduce dependence on external GPU suppliers and accelerate custom chip and data‑centre designs through partner integrations like Broadcom by building teams, architecture and deployment pipelines.
Who is Sachin Katti and what he brings to OpenAI
Background: Intel’s Chief Technology and Artificial Intelligence Officer
Sachin Katti joined Intel to lead technology and AI strategy, overseeing networking, edge computing and AI system efforts during his tenure. At Intel he managed cross‑discipline teams and roadmaps that balanced silicon, firmware and system deliverables. His move signals a transfer of systems‑level expertise from a leading silicon firm to a research‑first AI lab.
Track record in networking, edge computing and AI systems
Katti’s track record includes building networking stacks, edge‑optimized platforms and production AI pipelines. Examples: multi‑node networking projects, low‑latency edge inference deployments and partnerships with OEMs. Data point: he led initiatives that targeted throughput and latency improvements in the single‑ to multi‑ms range — crucial for large model serving.
New role at OpenAI: responsibilities for AGI compute infrastructure
At OpenAI he will be responsible for chip and system architecture, data‑centre integration, and vendor partnerships. Actionable insight: expect an emphasis on end‑to‑end co‑design, where hardware teams are embedded with model engineers to optimize performance and cost per token in production workloads.
Why OpenAI hired Intel’s AI chief
Strategic need: specialized data centre hardware to scale AGI
OpenAI’s models demand bespoke hardware to scale cost‑effectively. The hire addresses the strategic need for specialized data‑centre hardware and system engineering to support AGI‑level compute growth. Example: designing racks and interconnects tailored to transformer parallelism reduces overhead and improves utilization.
Reducing reliance on Nvidia and AMD with custom AI chips
OpenAI wants to reduce vendor lock‑in by developing custom accelerators. Actionable consideration for industry: expect optimized ISAs and memory subsystems tuned for large sparse models, which can yield 10–30% improvements in throughput versus generalized GPUs for certain workloads.
Partnership context: Broadcom collaboration and 2026 chip roadmap
OpenAI’s announced collaboration with Broadcom targets custom AI chip delivery by 2026. This hire accelerates integration between chip design, switch fabrics and data‑centre systems. Practically, OpenAI can co‑design silicon and interconnects to hit targeted power and latency envelopes.
Technical priorities for OpenAI’s next‑gen computing systems
Custom AI accelerators, chip architecture and system integration
Priority one is custom accelerators that balance FLOPS, memory bandwidth and sparsity support. Example components: on‑package memory, HBM variants and custom tensor units. Actionable insight: teams will evaluate ops/byte efficiency and aim for tighter model–hardware mapping to reduce inference and training costs.
Data centre networking, fabrics and thermal/power design for AGI
Network fabrics and power delivery are critical; AGI racks will require higher bisection bandwidth and liquid cooling in hotspots. Example: tighter RDMA integration and direct GPU‑to‑GPU fabrics to lower software orchestration overhead and improve scaling from single to multi‑rack training runs.
Software–hardware co‑design: model parallelism, orchestration and efficiency
Co‑design of model parallelism strategies, orchestration layers and runtime optimizations will be prioritized. Table: technical priorities overview.
| Priority | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Accelerator design | Custom cores for tensor ops | Reduced op latency |
| Memory subsystem | High BW, coherent caches | HBM variants |
| Interconnect | Low‑latency fabrics | RDMA over custom switches |
| Cooling & power | Thermal density solutions | Immersion or liquid cooling |
| Runtime software | Scheduler & model parallelism | Adaptive sharding |
Market and competitive implications for Intel, Nvidia and Broadcom
Impact on Intel: leadership changes and strategic repositioning
Intel faces a leadership gap in AI systems after Katti’s departure; its CEO reassigned responsibilities. Short‑term, Intel may refocus on partnerships and platforms while assessing talent retention. Actionable item for Intel watchers: monitor organizational updates and product roadmap revisions.
Nvidia’s dominance challenged: market share, performance and pricing effects
Nvidia remains dominant, but OpenAI’s push toward custom silicon could pressure pricing and market share over time. Example scenario: if OpenAI scales in‑house accelerators, third‑party GPU demand could soften for specific large model workloads.
Broadcom’s role in OpenAI’s chip supply chain and partner ecosystem
Broadcom becomes a strategic hardware partner for switch and ASIC integration. Table: competitive implications.
| Company | Short‑term effect | Long‑term effect |
|---|---|---|
| Intel | Leadership shuffle | Refocused platform strategy |
| Nvidia | Stable demand | Competitive pressure |
| Broadcom | Increased orders | Key partner for switches |
| OEMs | Design adjustments | New system SKUs |
| Cloud providers | Procurement shifts | Custom hosting offers |
Effects on data centres, cloud providers and enterprise users
Data centre hardware demand, retrofits and new facility requirements
Demand will shift toward higher‑density racks, advanced cooling and power distribution. Enterprises should audit PUE and rack power capacity now. Example: retrofitting existing halls for liquid cooling can take 6–18 months planning and capex.
Hyperscalers, cloud providers and hosting strategies for OpenAI compute
Hyperscalers may partner or offer co‑located custom racks; some will build dedicated pods. Actionable step: cloud providers should define pricing models that reflect differentiated hardware performance and reserved capacity.
Enterprise access, total cost of ownership and AI service availability
Enterprises can expect evolving access models: managed APIs, co‑location or licensed stacks. TCO will depend on utilization; careful workload placement and batching strategies will reduce effective cost per inference.
Risks, timeline and what to watch next
Technical, supply chain and integration risks for custom AI chips
Risks include fabrication lead times, firmware bugs and integration mismatches. Supply chain constraints for HBM, substrates and advanced nodes can create slip risks. Teams should budget for multi‑quarter validation cycles.
Expected milestones and timeline to 2026 and beyond
Key milestone: Broadcom‑linked chips targeted by 2026. Shorter milestones include architecture selection, prototype silicon and pilot racks over the next 12–24 months. Watch for public benchmark disclosures and partner announcements.
Regulatory, security and ethical considerations for AGI infrastructure
Deploying AGI‑grade infrastructure raises security, export and governance questions. Actionable recommendation: embed compliance, adversarial testing and access controls from design through deployment.
OpenAI’s hire of Sachin Katti leaves the organization positioned to accelerate custom compute and data‑centre strategies while prompting industry shifts in hardware sourcing, partnerships and facility design; next steps include prototype silicon, Broadcom integrations and pilot rack deployments toward a 2026 timeline, and stakeholders should watch benchmarks, partner announcements and procurement signals closely for the clearest indicators of progress at OpenAI.